Sunday, November 10, 2013
My last blog was about the love that a coach should have for his or her athletes. That may have been a bit esoteric or “religious” for some. Well, love is never a bad thing. Basically a coach should be coaching for the love of the sport and to give the athletes the best they can get in coaching and guidance. Coaching is about the athlete, not the coach.
This opinion could be misconstrued to mean that a coach should always be a nice guy and create a pleasant environment for the athletes. That is not what I am saying. Tough love and pressure are needed in order for an athlete to reach his or her potential.
The conscious competence theory of learning advances four stages of learning. They are: unconscious incompetence, conscious incompetence, conscious competence and finally unconscious competence. Stage 1 is being unaware of a skill and not understanding that the particular skill is necessary for success. When the athlete wants to learn the skill, they are consciously incompetent. They know that they have something to learn, and to work on the skill. As they learn the skill they become consciously competent, or they have to concentrate and think about the skill as they do it. Once they can perform the skill automatically, or without “thinking” about it, they are unconsciously competent.
When the athlete is motivated to learn, they should have a “safe” environment free of distractions and pressure in order to learn the skill. Competition at this stage is usually not good. Some like to compete even when learning a new skill, but not all. It takes time to learn a skill; an athlete who is slower to learn is not necessarily a poor athlete. It may be the coach!
You can’t coach all athletes the same. This is a major step in learning to coach. How do your athletes learn? What works best for each athlete? Do you listen to your athletes?
Once you have figured this out, and the athlete has learned the skill, they have to perfect the skill. Once the skill is automatic, they have to be able to perform it at speed. Can they then perform it at speed when they are tired? Tired and under pressure? Tired, under pressure in competition? Yes, things get complicated. Just don’t let them get complicated too quickly.
But once they master a skill, they must experience pressure if they are to succeed. Performing under pressure is not just good for success, performing under pressure is vital to success.
An athlete who wants to be better needs to understand their limits and then work on stretching these limits. This is not fun, and it is not easy. It can hurt. But it is part of getting better. And some athletes will not go outside of their comfort zone if they are not pushed. It’s a little like mama bird teaching baby bird to fly. Force them out of the nest. Apply pressure.
The trick is figuring out when to apply pressure and how much. This is not easy.
If you are very lucky as a coach, you have a very competent group of athletes and it happens on its own. When I worked as a conditioning coach with the Austrian men’s downhill training group (alpine ski racing) 5 of the athletes in the group were in the top 12 in the world in downhill. I worked with this group for 3 seasons, and of the 10 athletes I worked with, 2 were Olympic champions (not during my tenure), 3 were world champions and 8 were on a World Cup podium at least once. I am not trying to make myself look good, I just want to illustrate the caliber of this group of athletes. This made my job easy. I did not have to create pressure for these athletes; they had lived with it since they were young, trying to make provincial and national teams.
I have worked with other teams in other sports, sometimes other countries and for many athletes making the national team was enough. They felt like stars. Some did not have a brilliant international career, but they were on the national team. They didn’t make the next step to international success. I have tried to come up with ways to create pressure on these athletes at times. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn’t.
Pierre Lueders, a Canadian bobsleigh pilot, won an Olympic gold in Nagano in 1998 with Dave MacEachern. Before Pierre came on the scene, Chris Lori was the dominant Canadian pilot. Chris was a big part of putting Canada on the map in bobsleigh, winning the four-man World Cup overall title once and achieving 9 top 3 World Cup overall podiums in his career. Chris just missed his Olympic medal in 1992 (4th place) but was a big part of Canada’s success as an active athlete and paved the way for other athletes. When Pierre started to drive well, he became Chris’ competition. Chris did not make Pierre’s life as a pilot easy, and Pierre had to earn everything he got. This was the best thing that could happen to Pierre in my mind, because he learned that life was hard in bobsleigh, and he learned it at home in Canada.
Ken Shields, Canadian basketball coach, (5 years national team coach) won 7 consecutive Canadian university titles at the University of Victoria. People who worked with Ken told me that he made practices so tough that players saw games as holidays. He drove his players hard.
Michael Jordan was said to be very hard on his teammates. He was very competitive. He won 6 NBA titles.
This is an area where the art of coaching comes in, where a coach has to feel how much pressure is needed, and how much is too much. Not an easy task.
But one thing is true: as the Scottish philosopher Thomas Carlyle said, “No pressure, no diamonds”.
Friday, November 1, 2013
We coaches are trying to impart information to athletes. I have read 100s of books that I believe have given me valuable information that can make me a better coach. I have a master’s degree in exercise physiology and am working on a PhD. I search the internet for new ideas. I love learning.
I love helping athletes by sharing this information.
So why don’t they always understand and absorb my information?
This is a quote from Paul’s letter to the Corinthians (1Corinthinians Chapter 13, the Bible):
If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.
- New American Standard Version (1995)
My translation: I have all these beautiful and wonderful things to say, but if I cannot say them with love in my heart, I will not be heard, I will sound like the teacher in the Charlie Brown (Peanuts) cartoons. Waaa waaa waaa
If you haven’t seen the Peanuts cartoons, check this out.
What does love have to do with coaching and education?
Depending on the translation of Paul’s letter, charity is sometimes substituted for love.
From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_Corinthians_13
Chapter 13 … covers the subject of love… In the original Greek, The word AGAPE is used throughout… This is translated into English as charity in the King James version, but the word love is preferred by most other translations…
So, according to the author, AGAPE:
is long suffering (i.e. tolerant, patient)
is free of jealousy, envy and pride
does not display unseemly behavior
is not touchy, fretful or resentful
takes no account of the evil done to it [outwardly ignores a suffered wrong]
is associated with honesty
is greater than either faith or hope
I believe that these are great coaching characteristics. And the words superior, arrogant, and vain are not on the list.
It is a daily challenge to remember these things and LOVE my athletes.
I have much work to do in this area, but recognizing a weakness is the first step in overcoming it!